An independent resource published by owners. Not an official communication of the Jamacha Greens Homeowners Association.
Jamacha Greens Owner Coalition

The record

Statistics

Every figure on this site that can move, on one page. Each plate says which document it was read from and on what day. Nothing here is typed in twice: the plates draw from the same registers the rest of the site does, and the build fails if the two disagree.

What you pay The reserves Who owns the units Who votes

What you pay

The regular monthly assessment, each time the Association’s own papers show it changing. $659.52 against $290.00 is 2.274 times, a rise of 127.4% in five years. The last two steps are each exactly 20%, which is the most a board may add in a year without a member vote; the step before them is 19.9% only because $458.40 was adopted as $458.00.

Bold labels mark a step at the 20% ceiling. The step from $290.00 to $350.00 happened somewhere between fiscal year 2021 and September 2023, in a step or steps no document held gives a date for. Sources: the FY2021, FY2024, FY2025 and FY2026 Annual Budget Reports and the Association’s Assessment Increase notice of August 31, 2023, each read on September 18, 2026. Table and derivation on the assessments page.
The figures
EffectiveMonthlyChangeSource
Fiscal year 2021 $290.00 — FY2021 Annual Budget Report and Policy Statement, November 24, 2020, p. 2 — "The regular assessment per ownership interest is $290.00."
Until September 30, 2023 $350.00 +$60.00, 20.7% Assessment Increase notice, Jamacha Greens HOA Board of Directors, August 31, 2023 — "Old Amount $350.00". The step or steps from $290.00 to $350.00 are not dated by any document held.
From October 1, 2023 $382.00 +$32.00, 9.1% Assessment Increase notice, August 31, 2023 — "New Amount $382.00", effective October 1, 2023, approved at an emergency meeting of August 16, 2023.
From January 1, 2024 $458.00 +$76.00, 19.9% FY2024 Annual Budget Report and Policy Statement, November 28, 2023.
From January 1, 2025 $549.60 +$91.60, 20.0% FY2025 Annual Budget Report and Policy Statement, November 25, 2024.
From January 1, 2026 $659.52 +$109.92, 20.0% FY2026 Annual Budget Report and Annual Policy Statement, November 1, 2025; an owner's September 2026 assessment statement carries the same figure.

The reserves

A reserve fund pays for the roofs, the paving and the balconies as they wear out. “Percent funded” is what the fund holds against what the study says it should hold by now. Four studies, four figures, from the reports the Association mailed with each budget.

0% 20% 40% 60% “weak” below 30% Study of September 21, 2020: 45.3% funded — $676,116 of $1,492,033 45.3% 2020 Study of September 6, 2023: 14.5% funded — $230,164 of $1,584,976 14.5% 2023 Study of July 3, 2024: 16.6% funded — $288,872 of $1,744,053 16.6% 2024 Study of June 30, 2025: 28.7% funded — $543,587 of $1,896,764 28.7% 2025
The dashed line is the FY2026 report’s own scale: “0% - 30% = WEAK. At this level of funding, Special Assessments and deferred maintenance are likely.” The fund does not fall because money leaves it. It falls because the work arrives: the FY2026 study puts paved surfaces at one to two years of remaining life, which alone is close to everything the fund holds. Sources: the reserve study executive summaries of September 21, 2020, September 6, 2023, July 3, 2024, June 30, 2025, by Sonnenberg & Company, CPAs, each distributed with that year’s Annual Budget Report; read September 18, 2026.
The figures
StudyPercent fundedCash projected at year endFully funded would beAnnual requirement
September 21, 2020 (FY2021 report) 45.3% $676,116 $1,492,033 $156,259
September 6, 2023 (FY2024 report) 14.5% $230,164 $1,584,976 $154,586
July 3, 2024 (FY2025 report) 16.6% $288,872 $1,744,053 $159,366
June 30, 2025 (FY2026 report) 28.7% $543,587 $1,896,764 $165,904

What each budget put in, against what the study asked for

The study names an annual requirement: what it takes each year to keep the components on schedule. The budget names what the board actually allocated. Solid is the allocation; the outline is the requirement.

Half-funding a roof does not make the other half go away; it waits, at the study’s 3% a year. FY2022 and FY2023 reports are not held, and the FY2023 figure is the prior-year column of the FY2024 budget. Sources: the budget page of each Annual Budget Report (line 09910, Reserves) and the annual requirement printed on the executive summary distributed with it; read September 18, 2026.
The figures
Fiscal yearBudgetedStudy’s requirementShare
2021 $162,252 $156,259 (study of September 21, 2020) 103.8%
2023 $41,400 $154,586 (study of September 6, 2023) 26.8%
2024 $99,000 $154,586 (study of September 6, 2023) 64.0%
2025 $82,982.40 $159,366 (study of July 3, 2024) 52.1%
2026 $225,058.08 $165,904 (study of June 30, 2025) 135.7%

The next five years, as the Association projects them

The funding disclosure the Association must send with each budget prints two projections, not one. Neither is the budget the board adopted: the first assumes only assessments already approved, the second the study’s recommended plan.

−$500k $0 $500k $1M $1.5M Year 1Year 2Year 3Year 4Year 5 Required in the fund, year 1: $1,313,744Required in the fund, year 2: $1,220,592Required in the fund, year 3: $1,179,970Required in the fund, year 4: $1,258,139Required in the fund, year 5: $1,381,131 $1,381,131 On assessments already approved, year 1: −$114,430On assessments already approved, year 2: −$290,428On assessments already approved, year 3: −$416,232On assessments already approved, year 4: −$425,502On assessments already approved, year 5: −$392,124 −$392,124 On the study’s recommended plan, year 1: $42,177On the study’s recommended plan, year 2: $40,559On the study’s recommended plan, year 3: $110,377On the study’s recommended plan, year 4: $323,385On the study’s recommended plan, year 5: $470,284 $470,284

Required in the fundOn assessments already approvedOn the study’s recommended plan

On assessments already approved the fund is -8.7% funded at the end of year one and -28.4% at the end of year five, below zero throughout. On the recommended plan it reaches 34.1% in year five, which the report calls fair. The plan is 20% a year through FY2031 and $570,000 of special assessments across FY2026 to FY2029. Source: FY2026 Annual Budget Report, Assessment and Reserve Funding Disclosure Summary, December 31, 2025, item (7). Prepared by Sonnenberg & Company, CPAs. Read September 18, 2026.
The figures
End of year12345
Required in the fund$1,313,744$1,220,592$1,179,970$1,258,139$1,381,131
On assessments already approved−$114,430−$290,428−$416,232−$425,502−$392,124
On the study’s recommended plan$42,177$40,559$110,377$323,385$470,284
percent funded, approved only-8.7%-23.8%-35.3%-33.8%-28.4%
percent funded, recommended plan3.2%3.3%9.4%25.7%34.1%

Who owns the units

The Association’s resident directory carries one owner record per unit. Read on September 17, 2026, it puts 187 of the 192 units under 147 distinct owner names; the other 5 list “Private Residence” where the name would be, and who holds them is not known. One unit is one vote, so this is also who holds the votes. The directory is re-read monthly and a snapshot with no names is kept, so this section will grow a second point.

Owners of one unit, and owners of more

138 of the 147 named owners hold exactly one unit. The largest single holding is 18 units, which is 9.4% of the vote; its owner is a sitting director and is not named here, because the site names nobody’s holdings but the register’s aggregate. Source: Jamacha Greens Resident Directory, Pernicano Realty & Management owner portal, read September 17, 2026; the de-identified snapshot in docs/roster/, from which this plate is computed at build time.

Units held by owners of at least…

The same roll read the other way: for each size of holding, how many owners have at least that many units, and how much of the 192 they hold between them.

Every bar is drawn against the full 192. The five owners of five or more hold 41 units between them, about 21% of the vote; the 138 owners of one hold 138, about 72%. Source: the same directory read, September 17, 2026.
The figures
HoldingOwners of exactly this manyOwners of at least this manyUnits they hold
181118 of 192
63436 of 192
51541 of 192
24949 of 192
1138147187 of 192
name withheld——5 of 192

Which units are rented out

A tenant record is the manager’s knowledge that a unit is rented out, not a census. One square per unit: 106 of the 192 units carry a tenant record, 55.2%, and only 20 of those name the tenant. The other 86 carry the placeholder the manager enters when a unit is rented out.

Tenant named (20) Placeholder tenant record (86) No tenant record (86)

Filled from the front, not by address: the grid says how many, not which. The March 2026 figure of 117 units, given by telephone, was superseded by this reading. Source: Jamacha Greens Resident Directory, Pernicano Realty & Management owner portal, read September 17, 2026.

How concentrated it has been, 1975 to today

The long view, against the same 192 units. How well each figure is evidenced is drawn on the bar: solid for a recorded instrument, hatched for an Association record, an outline for a property aggregator’s rows, which can only be a floor.

What one partnership took in a single afternoon in 1975 is more than five times the largest holding anyone has here now. The story of those two deeds is on the McKeon Construction page. Sources: 1975-0364671, Exhibit "A"; 1976-0400472, and the 1977 consent block; homes.com ownership rows, unverified; the Association's resident directory.

Who votes

Ballots returned for each election, against the two lines that decide whether they are opened: 51% of 192 is 97.92, so it takes 98 at an annual meeting, and 20% of 192 is 38.4, so it takes 39 at a meeting reconvened after one that fell short. A solid bar is a count the Inspector certified in writing; a hatched one was announced at a meeting and not yet certified; a dashed stub means no count is on record at all.

Quorum, 98 of 192 Reconvened-meeting quorum, 39 of 192

The bars are drawn against all 192 units, so the empty space above each one is the number of owners who did not send a ballot back. What each meeting decided, and when the next one is, is on the election records. Sources: Notice of Annual Meeting & Election of Directors, HOA Elect CA, for September 17, 2026; The Inspector of Elections’ announcements at the September 17, 2026 annual meeting on Zoom — 49 ballots returned, quorum not met, adjournment to October 15, 2026, and that votes for Tricia Halsema would not be counted — as recorded in an owner’s contemporaneous notes. No written report of that meeting has been issued to us yet; when one is, it replaces this line.; Notice of Annual Meeting and Election, HOA Elect CA, for the December 3, 2025 meeting; Report of Inspectors of Election, Lisa Schwartz, for the 2023 election year meeting held February 15, 2024.
The figures
ElectionCounted atBallotsReported
2023 election year — meeting held February 15, 2024February 15, 202451certified
2025 annual meeting and electionDecember 3, 2025—no count on record
2026 annual meeting and electionSeptember 17, 202649announced

About these figures

Each plate is computed at build time from a register in this site’s own source, and a check reads the built page against that register and against the pages that cite the same documents. A figure here is therefore exactly the figure elsewhere on the site, or the site does not build. The dues and reserve figures move when a budget report arrives, once a year; the ballots when an Inspector reports; the directory figures on a monthly re-read. Ballots as of September 17, 2026; the directory as of September 17, 2026.

Got a specific question? The Research Desk reads the documents and the law and writes you an answer with sources.The Research Desk can help

Try it Beta

↑↓ to move↵ to openEsc to close